Legal Opinion

Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive Works

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1877No. 157PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

93 U.S. 664

23 L.Ed. 1003

HERVEY ET AL.

v.

RHODE ISLAND LOCOMOTIVE WORKS.

October Term, 1876

1

The courts look to the purpose of the parties; and, if that purpose be to give the vendor a lien on the property until payment in full of the purchase-money, it is liable to be defeated by creditors of the vendee who is in possession of it.

2

ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois.

3

On the twenty-first day of August, 1871, the Rhode Island Locomotive Works entered into a contract with J. Edwin Conant & Co., as follows:——

4

'This agreement, made this twenty-first…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Davis.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Black v. J. W. Zacharie & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Forbes v. MarshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  4. Brundage v. CampIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Buckmaster v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API