Legal Opinion
John Pochiro and Karen Pochiro, Husband and Wife v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 1987No. 85-2799PublishedCited by 137 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellee’s petition for rehearing is denied.
The Court’s opinion filed on July 14, 1987, is hereby withdrawn.
OPINION
NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
In January 1983, the Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential) sued John Pochiro and his wife, Karen, in Arizona state court, pleading various causes of action based upon allegations that Pochiro appropriated for his own use confidential customer information obtained while Pochiro was an employee of Prudential (the Prudential action). In December 1983, the Pochiros sued Prudential in Arizona state court, pleading various causes of action…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Edward Ashton v. Kenneth CoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Harriet M. Gould, an Unremarried Widow v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International and Paramount Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In re Pegasus Gold Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Richard Roe v. John O'DOnOhueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Tech Hills II Associates, Cross-Appellee v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Keith v. Pinkstaff Linda L. Pinkstaff, Debtors. Keith v. Pinkstaff Linda L. Pinkstaff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.