Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hillman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1926No. Appeal, 71PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Davis, plaintiff, brought this action of assumpsit against defendant, Hillman, to recover damages for breach of a parol contract to acquire and resell land, the profits derived to be equally divided between the parties. The former had acquired knowledge of coal properties in southwestern Pennsylvania, and at various times had interested the latter in purchases and sales of such. In June of 1919, he learned that the Ellsworth Collieries Company desired to secure a certain acreage, which he could buy, and that it was willing to sell a portion of its tract. It was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Chester v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Hertzog v. Hertzog's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  4. Edgcomb v. CloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. McBride v. Western Pennsylvania Paper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Kalyvas v. KalyvasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Metzger v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Haskell v. HeathcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Mott v. KaldesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API