Legal Opinion

Sferra v. Urling

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1937No. Appeal, 144PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

We held when this case was here before, 324 Pa. 344, that there was no abuse of discretionary power by the court below in opening a default judgment for rent, as there was sufficient evidence to support findings of a waiver of compliance with the covenant requiring written consent to an assignment of the lease, and the existence of an oral agreement whereby appellee was to pay rent on a percentage basis rather than in accordance with the provisions of the lease calling for fixed monthly payments. The facts were fully stated in that appeal.

This appeal is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Mott v. KaldesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Barclay v. BarclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Zlotziver v. ZlotziverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Suchan Et Ux. v. SwopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Frank v. PeckichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Brown v. HahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API