Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Stavely
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 2005No. 04CA0450PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by:
Judge TAUBMAN.
Two county court judges, John F. Stavely and Thomas Reed (collectively county courts), appeal the district court’s order granting the C.R.C.P. 106 motions of defendants, Alicia Byrd and Robert Claudell, to have their criminal cases tried by a jury without being required to follow statutory procedures that apply to petty offenses. We affirm.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a defendant charged with driving while ability impaired (DWAI), a misdemeanor, must comply with the requirements of § 16-10-109(2), C.R.S.2004, to have his or her case tried by a jury.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Frank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- United States v. NachtigalSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Guzman/HecklerOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- Roalstad v. City of Lafayette, ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Goodwine v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Roalstad v. City of LafayetteColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Roalstad v. City of Lafayette, ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2015