Legal Opinion

Goodwine v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 2010No. 08-CM-1044PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAMER, Associate Judge:

Appellant, Phyllis Goodwine, appeals from her simple assault conviction, arguing that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting certain hearsay statements and evidence of her prior bad acts, as well as in excluding the details of the victim’s prior convictions. Appellant also asserts that an alleged recantation by the victim and the absence of a witness at trial created reasonable doubt as to her guilt. 1 Appellant further contends that because her trial was to the court, not a jury, the trial court plainly erred by adding 100 hours of community service…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Walden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Flores v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Austin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Parker & Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Parker & Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API