Legal Opinion
Heimer v. Salisbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 19, 1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff-appellant, a motorcycle policeman in East Hartford, was injured by collision with defendant’s automobile at the intersection of Burnside Avenue and Tolland Street on September 13th, 1926. Payments were made to him under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act by East Hartford, and upon application the latter was joined as party plaintiff in this action.
Burnside Avenue is a public highway running approximately east and west, and Tolland Street branches from the northerly side of Burnside Avenue and runs in a northeasterly direction. Two lines of trolley car tracks are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farrell v. Waterbury Horse R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Mezzi v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Ferrie v. SperrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Temple v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Messinger v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brassfield v. SearsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Scogin v. NugenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Aubrey v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Smith v. LámarSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Dole v. LublinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.