Legal Opinion

Dole v. Lublin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The single ground of appeal is the action of the trial court in setting aside the verdicts given to the plaintiffs by the jury. The court’s memorandum shows that the ground upon which this action was taken was the view that the jury could not reasonably and properly have found otherwise than that the cause of the accident was the negligence of the plaintiff’s driver and that the defendant’s driver was not negligent.

From the evidence the jury could reasonably have found that the plaintiff in the first mentioned case is a son of the plaintiff in the second case, and was then a boy about eight…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heimer v. SalisburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Hammer v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Brody v. DickieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Hawley v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Rockaway Bus CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Herman v. SladofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Burk v. CorradoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Ballou v. Jewett City Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Danehy v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API