Legal Opinion
Cocherl v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 06ap-1100 (6-26-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 2007No. 06AP-1100PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Daniel J. Cocherl, appeals from the summary judgment entered against him by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas which found his request to amend his workers' compensation claim to include an additional allowance to be time-barred by the ten-year statute of limitations in R.C. 4123.52. For the following reasons, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On December 6, 1989, plaintiff was injured in the course and scope of his employment with defendant-appellee, Ohio Department of Transportation ("ODOT"). Joint Stipulations of Fact ("Stipulations"), ¶ 1. Plaintiff filed a workers'…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Mergenthal v. Star Banc Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Helton v. Scioto County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State ex rel. McLean v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Collinsworth v. Western Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chatfield v. Whirlpool Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Caldwell v. Whirlpool Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024