Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Ruth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1983No. 2814PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, dated September 30, 1981. The procedural history and facts relevant to the issues on appeal are as follows:

On July 9, 1980 the appellant, wife, instituted an action under the New Divorce Code, alleging that the marriage was irretrievably broken.1 Subsequently, the appellee, husband, filed a consent to the entry of a divorce decree. On July 30, 1980 the wife filed additional claims for alimony, counsel fees, child support2 and distribution of marital property under Section 401 of the Code.

A hearing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Gee v. GeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Jack v. JackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Oswald v. OswaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Semasek v. SemasekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. King v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Braderman v. BradermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Flynn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API