Legal Opinion

Gee v. Gee

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1983No. 838PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in declaring certain items “marital property” under the Divorce Code, 1 and in accepting the master’s unsupported estimate of the fair market rental value of the parties’ real property. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the lower court.

The parties married in July, 1961 and separated in November, 1978. Appellee was granted a divorce on grounds of indignities on July 29, 1980 and her petition for equitable distribution of property was referred to a master. After a hearing and the filing of the master’s report and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bacchetta v. BacchettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Platek v. PlatekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Semasek v. SemasekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. King v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Ruth v. RuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API