Legal Opinion

In Re Cardinal Health, Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 1, 2005No. Master File C2-04-575PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion For Partial Stay of Overlapping State Court Proceedings. [Docket No. 123]. Specifically, Defendants request a stay of all proceedings and/or discovery in the state-court derivative action relating to the accounting issues raised in the federal securities complaints. The Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to stay all discovery in the state court case relating to the accounting issues raised in the federal securities complaints. This stay shall remain in effect pending this Court’s disposition of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Telxon Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  2. Newby v. Enron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Tobias Holdings, Inc. v. Bank United Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. In Re DPL Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Deriv. Lit.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
  2. In Re DOT Hill Systems Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2008
  3. Taylor v. FernandesNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API