In Re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Deriv. Lit.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY
JAMES WARE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a shareholders’ derivative action brought on behalf of Nominal Defendant Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. (“Maxim” or the “Company”) against current and former officers and directors of the Company (collectively, “Individual Defendants”) 1 for, inter alia, alleged violations of §§ 10(b), 14(a), and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. Plaintiffs 2 allege that the Individual Defendants engaged in a scheme to manipulate stock…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Carlucci v. HanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- New York City Employees' Retirement System v. BerryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.