State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. D. F. W.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Mother and father separately appeal from a judgment terminating their parental rights to M. W., their daughter. On de novo review, ORS 419A.200(6)(b), we conclude that the Department of Human Services (DHS) has not proved the necessary statutory criteria by clear and convincing evidence as to either parent. See ORS 419.521(1) (establishing standard of proof). We therefore reverse as to both mother and father.
We state the facts as we find them on de novo review.1 Our fundamental finding is that both mother and father had serious problems at the time that DHS first obtained custody of M. W. and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. State Office for Services to Children & Families v. StillmanOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. G. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. C. M. K.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Department of Human Services v. E. N.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Dept. of Human Services v. M. E. B. -T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026