Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. C. M. K.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 25, 2015No. 09629J; Petition Number 09629J05; A157151; 10220J; Petition Number 10220J04; A157154; 09629J; Petition Number 09629J04; A157272; 10220J; Petition Number 10220J03; A157273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

In this consolidated appeal, parents separately appeal judgments terminating their parental rights to their children, I and K, both four years old at the time of trial (though 10 months apart in age). The juvenile court determined that parents were unfit under ORS 419B.504 because they were unable to provide minimally adequate parenting at the time of trial and would not be able to do so within a time that was reasonable for I and K due to conduct or conditions that were not likely to change. On appeal, both parents contend that the court erred in concluding that the Department of Human…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Office for Services to Children & Families v. StillmanOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Dept. of Multnomah County v. FwOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. F. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. D. F. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dept. of Human Services v. C. F. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Dept. of Human Services v. J. J. / E. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. C. F. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. J. J. / E. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API