Legal Opinion

Wentzel v. Huebner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1960No. 9814-aPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The paramount contention of the defendant in this action, brought under SDC 44.0362, commonly referred to as the guest statute, is that the evidence, considered most favorably from plaintiff’s viewpoint, falls to establish “willful and wanton misconduct” on the part of defendant. The case was submitted to the jury and a substantial verdict for plaintiff was returned. The stated contention was raised below by a motion for a directed verdict made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, and renewed at the close of the evidence, and by motions for a judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial.

The father…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  2. Melby v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Peters v. HoisingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Granflaten v. RohdeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mulder v. TagueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. SprySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. PercySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Brewer v. MatternSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Tranby v. BrodockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API