Riddell v. Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COOPER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on motion of defendant, Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange, for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons stated, defendant’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
The central issue of this motion concerns the validity of a release signed by a terminated employee. Plaintiff Nancy Riddell (“Riddell”) worked as a customer service representative for defendant Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange (“MIIX”) from March 25, 1996, to January 16, 1998. (Compl.¶ 3.) Riddell alleges that she often worked in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- James Boyd and Elizabeth Boyd v. Ford Motor Company Rouge Steel Company the Motor Vessel Ms. Henry Ford IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cole v. Gaming Entertainment, L.L.C.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Mosley v. Bay Ship Management, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Recchia v. Kellogg Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Sutherland v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Buc-Ee's, Ltd., A/K/A Buc-Ee's, Inc. v. John J. Hribek, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.