Legal Opinion

Wright v. City of Monticello

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 28, 2001No. 01-105PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

The issue presented in this case is whether the City of Monticello can extinguish a private right-of-way providing Opal Wright a means of ingress and egress to her property by use of a dedicated city street by abandonment or vacation of the street and conveyance of the property to the landowners flanking the street. The chancellor (1) recognized Ms. Wright’s property interest in her right-of-way through the street, but concluded that the property rights were subordinate to the City of Monticello’s right to control and regulate the use of public streets; (2) dissolved an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meadors v. StillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. KesnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Flake v. Thompson, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. McNeillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. City of Little Rock v. LinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Malloy v. ReyesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Laird v. ShelnutSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Murphy v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Saine v. Comcast Cablevision of Arkansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Feland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API