Legal Opinion

Ark. State Highway Comm. v. McNeill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1964No. 5-3274PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a suit by the appellees, Troy McNeill and his wife, to enjoin the State Highway Commission from constructing a cloverleaf interchange upon a highway near the McNeills’ home, unless the Commission first files a bond to secure any damages that the McNeills may suffer as a result of the construction.” The Commission contends that the presence of the completed interchange will not cause any legally compensable damage to the plaintiffs. The chancellor, rejecting this defense, granted the injunction but withheld any determination of the McNeills’ damages until the principal question has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Town of Stamford v. VuonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Peters v. BucknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Campbell v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Anderson v. LynchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Southern California Edison Co. v. BourgerieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. KesnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Flake v. Thompson, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Wenderoth v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. FrankelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API