Feland v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
Appellant William Feland was convicted of driving while intoxicated and violating Fayetteville’s noise ordinance. On appeal, he argues that the trial court should have granted Iris motion to suppress on the grounds that the noise ordinance is unconstitutional, and the police officer who pulled him over should have known of the ordinance’s unconstitutionality.
This case was tried to the court on the following stipulated facts. Feland was driving his truck in the early morning hours of August 27, 2001, along Gregg Street in Fayetteville. A Fayetteville police officer observed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Harris v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Herman Wilson Lumber Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Solis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- White v. Arkansas Capital Corp./Diamond State VenturesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Joshua Parks v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Peo v. TarrColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- Steffy v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.