Legal Opinion

Lombard v. Rohrbaugh

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 14, 2001No. Record 002459; Record 002675PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lemons

In these two appeals, we consider whether the trial court erred in permitting Dorsey W. Rohrbaugh (“Rohrbaugh”) to mention liability insurance during cross-examination of a physician who testified on behalf of Ralph D. Lombard (“Lombard”) and Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (“Farm Bureau”). Additionally, we consider the enforceability at trial of a stipulation reached during pretrial discovery proceedings and the trial court’s denial of Lombard’s proffered cautionary instruction.

I. Facts and Proceedings Below

Rohrbaugh was injured in an automobile accident on August 11, 1995,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  2. Coe v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. Swisher v. Swisher & CraunSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  4. Rakes v. FulcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  5. Otwell v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Sawyer v. ComerciSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. Monahan v. Obici Medical Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. Caison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  5. Vasquez v. RoccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API