Legal Opinion
Murungi v. Mercedes Benz Credit Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 27, 2001No. 6:01-cv-06378PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs pro se (“plaintiffs”), residents of the State of Louisiana, filed a complaint in this Court on August 7, 2001, alleging causes of action under federal and New York State law concerning the purchase of a used 1989 Mercedes Benz from defendant Holtz House of Vehicles, Inc. 1 (“HHOV”). Financing of the car was ultimately assumed by defendant Mercedes Benz Credit Corporation (“MBCC”). By motion filed September 4, 2001, MBCC sought dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), failure to state a claim upon which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James Walker v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Lucille Qualls Woods v. Dunlop Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Bolt Electric, Inc. v. The City of New York, Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Statler v. Dell, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Diaz v. Paragon Motors of Woodside, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Jackson v. Eddy's LI RV Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Hillery v. Georgie Boy Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.