Legal Opinion

Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2007No. 102588PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Kilbride, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

Plaintiff, Lucy Mydlach, filed a three-count complaint in the circuit court of Cook County against defendant, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, alleging claims under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (Magnuson-Moss Act or Act) (15 U.S.C. §2301 et seq. (1994)). The circuit court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the claims were time-barred under the four-year statute of limitations contained in section 2 — 725…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Trans-Spec Truck Service, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Reynolds v. Jimmy John's Enterprises, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  4. Duffy v. TogherAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Brame v. City of North ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API