Legal Opinion

Seaway Products Pipeline Co. v. Hanley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 2004No. 2-03-127-CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOB McCOY, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant Seaway Products Pipeline Company (“Seaway”) claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees Doyle Hanley (“Han-ley”), Tom Chambers (“Chambers”), Aledo Construction, Inc. (“Aledo”), Annetta Development Corporation (“Annetta”), and Richard A. Bloomfield, Sr. (“Bloomfield, Sr.”) on causes of action arising from the rupture of a pressurized gasoline pipeline during the development of a lot in a residential subdivision. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In the late 1980s Chambers became the owner of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Dukes v. Philip Johnson/Alan Ritchie Architects, P.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Vine Street, LLC v. Keeling Ex Rel. Estate of KeelingDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
  4. Dean v. Frank W. Neal & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. v. John T. Lupton Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API