Legal Opinion

Coastal Conduit & Ditching, Inc. v. Noram Energy Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 14, 2000No. 14-99-00273-CVPublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.

Coastal Conduit & Ditching, Inc. (“Coastal Conduit”) appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of Noram Energy Corp. d/b/a Entex (“Entex”) on Coastal Conduit’s claims for negligence, negligence per se, and gross negligence, and its suit for declaratory judgment. In this case, we consider whether Texas law prohibits the recovery of purely economic damages in negligence in the absence of a claim for personal injury or property damage when the parties are contractual strangers. We affirm.

I. Background

Coastal Conduit provides services for the trenching and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Patterson v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bonham State Bank v. BeadleTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1986

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of AltonTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Aikens v. DebowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lidawi v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  4. lan/stv, a Joint Venture of Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. and Stv Incorporated v. Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Franco v. Slavonic Mutual Fire Insurance Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API