Legal Opinion

PHILLIPS PIPE LINE COMPANY v. Razo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 1, 1966No. 237PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELLERS, Justice.

This suit was brought by Emilio Razo, plaintiff, against Phillips Pipe Line Company, Bechtel Corporation and J. A. Mercer, defendants, to recover for personal injuries to himself in the sum of $304,288.00. The injuries to the appellee were alleged to be the result of an explosion of Phillips’ Ethylene pipe line when struck by a KD-7 Caterpillar bulldozer which was attached to a metal sled upon which appellee was. riding. To appellee’s cause of action, the defendants Phillips Pipe Line Company and J. A. Mercer filed their answer denying generally the material allegations…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McAfee v. Travis Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hernandez v. HeldenfelsTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Texas-Louisiana Power Co. v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KeltonArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McWilliams v. Kentucky Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phillips Pipe Line Company v. RazoTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Mrs. Thomas Floyd Allen, Etc., Aetna Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant v. Texas and Pacific Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Phillips Pipe Line Company v. RazoTexas Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API