Legal Opinion

Schultes Real Estate Co., Inc. v. Curis

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1988No. Docket 91452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.

Defendant-appellant appeals by leave granted from the circuit court’s order affirming the district court’s judgment awarding plaintiff a brokerage commission. We reverse.

On June 28, 1982, plaintiff obtained a listing agreement from Doctor and Mrs. Pokorny, the land contract vendees, of the home at 80 Stillmeadow in Grosse Pointe Shores. The Pokornys agreed to pay plaintiff a seven percent commission if it sold their interest in the home. Plaintiff’s agent Paula Moore attempted to sell the home.

Defendant Michael Curis (hereinafter defendant), a licensed real estate broker, made an offer to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michigan Association of Psychotherapy Clinics v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Thompson v. Carey's Real EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Borisoff v. SchattenMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. In Re Fritz EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Beznos v. BorisoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arco Industries Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Arco Industries Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Schultes Real Estate Co., Inc. v. CurisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API