Schultes Real Estate Co., Inc. v. Curis
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.
Defendant-appellant appeals by leave granted from the circuit court’s order affirming the district court’s judgment awarding plaintiff a brokerage commission. We reverse.
On June 28, 1982, plaintiff obtained a listing agreement from Doctor and Mrs. Pokorny, the land contract vendees, of the home at 80 Stillmeadow in Grosse Pointe Shores. The Pokornys agreed to pay plaintiff a seven percent commission if it sold their interest in the home. Plaintiff’s agent Paula Moore attempted to sell the home.
Defendant Michael Curis (hereinafter defendant), a licensed real estate broker, made an offer to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michigan Association of Psychotherapy Clinics v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Thompson v. Carey's Real EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Borisoff v. SchattenMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re Fritz EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Beznos v. BorisoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arco Industries Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Arco Industries Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Schultes Real Estate Co., Inc. v. CurisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988