Legal Opinion
Beznos v. Borisoff
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1954No. Docket 16, Calendar 45,944PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
Samuel Beznos, a licensed real-estate broker, doing business as Beznos Realty Investment Company, brought an action for compensation claimed to be due him from defendant Maurice Borisoff. The essential facts are stipulated as follows:
“Plaintiff and defendant had entered into an oral agreement by the terms of which the defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff 50% of the commission derived from the sale of a real-estate parcel, in-return for plaintiff’s information, advising defendant that said parcel of real estate was on the market, said parcel being identified as 7375 Dunedin street,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. StarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Thompson v. Carey's Real EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Borisoff v. SchattenMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Renaud v. MoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Fleming v. James S. Holden Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Summers v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Dura v. Walker, Hart & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Aetna Mortgage Co. v. DembsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Schultes Real Estate Co., Inc. v. CurisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.