Legal Opinion

Beznos v. Borisoff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1954No. Docket 16, Calendar 45,944PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Samuel Beznos, a licensed real-estate broker, doing business as Beznos Realty Investment Company, brought an action for compensation claimed to be due him from defendant Maurice Borisoff. The essential facts are stipulated as follows:

“Plaintiff and defendant had entered into an oral agreement by the terms of which the defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff 50% of the commission derived from the sale of a real-estate parcel, in-return for plaintiff’s information, advising defendant that said parcel of real estate was on the market, said parcel being identified as 7375 Dunedin street,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Thompson v. Carey's Real EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Borisoff v. SchattenMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Renaud v. MoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Fleming v. James S. Holden Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Summers v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Dura v. Walker, Hart & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Aetna Mortgage Co. v. DembsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Schultes Real Estate Co., Inc. v. CurisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API