Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Carey's Real Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1953No. Docket 28, Calendar 45,201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Defendant was a licensed real estate broker under PA 1919, No 306, as amended (CL 1948, § 451.201 et seq. [Stat Ann and Stat Ann 1951 Cum Supp §19.791 et seg.]). Plaintiff was licensed under the act and employed as defendant’s salesman. Under an oral agreement of employment defendant agreed to pay plaintiff a sum equal to a specified percentage of the commissions received by defendant on sales produced by plaintiff. Plaintiff obtained a listing and later a purchaser therefor as a result of which defendant received a certain commission. This is a suit for the balance claimed to be due…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Summers v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Beznos v. BorisoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Louis A. Demute, Inc. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Sorenson v. Brice Realty CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. JA Cantor & Associates, Inc. v. DevoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API