Legal Opinion

In re Dreshfield

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 20, 1940No. 4282; No. 4283PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

These are appeals from the decisions of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decisions of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, 8, 15, 16, and 17 in appellant’s application, serial No. 152,194 (appeal No. 4282), for an. alleged invention relating to improvements in dry rosin size, and. claims Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, and 8 in appellant’s application, serial No. 8,472 (appeal No. 4283), for an alleged invention relating to improvements in dry rosin size.

In this court, counsel for appellant moved that the following claims be dismissed:…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Application of Walter Grimme, Werner Keil and Heinrich SchmitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  2. Application of Nathaniel GrierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of OppenauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. Application of Le BaronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. Application of CoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API