Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Besaw v. Work

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 1, 1925No. 4242PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus to require the Secretary of the Interior to pay to relator his per capita interest in certain funds belonging to and being distributed to the Menominee Indians in the state of Wisconsin.

Relator, Besaw, admitted to be a Menominee Indian of mixed blood, was bom May 1, 1842, among the Menominee Indians at Fox river, in what is now the state of Wisconsin. His father was a white man. His mother was a Menominee Indian woman of mixed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Oakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Pape v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  2. (PS) Channel v. ShulkinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (PS) Giddens v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (PS) Kopp v. Tice-RaskinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (PS) Sharma v. City of ReddingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API