Legal Opinion

Oakes v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1909No. 2,797PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

By their suit commenced and prosecuted under Act Feb. 6, 1901, c. 217, 31 Stat. 760, the appellants asserted that they were entitled to have allotted to them in severalty, under Act Jan. 14, 1889, c. 21, 25 Stat. 642, certain specified lands in the White Earth Indian reservation in Minnesota, that their *306applications- for such allotments had been unlawfully denied by the officers charged with the allotment of the lands in that reservation, and therefore that they were entitled to a decree recognizing and enforcing their rights to such allotments. Upon the final…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. HealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Frost v. WenieSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. GreathouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. McChord v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Besaw v. WorkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
  2. Lemieux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Stuart v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  4. Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Sully v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API