Legal Opinion
(PS) Giddens v. Becerra
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 15, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01263Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD GIDDENS, No. 2:19-cv-1263 TLN DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 XAVIER BECERRA, in his official FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS capacity as Attorney General of the State of 15 California; and SOLANO COUNTY, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Richard Giddens is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 19 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 20 before the undersigned are defendants Xavier Becerra and Solano County’s motions to…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.