(PS) Kopp v. Tice-Raskin

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUKE JAMES KOPP, No. 2:23-cv-02631-DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 S. ROBERT TICE-RASKIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 18 to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff’s action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

names as Defendants a state 19 court judge and an attorney. The Complaint does not allege discernible facts but rather refers to 20 attachments, which are similarly unclear. See ECF No. 1 at 5-11.…