Lake Drainage Commissioners v. Spencer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiffs from Daniels, J., at May Term, 1917, of Hyde.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
The plaintiffs’ drainage district was duly established by proceedings regular on their face. It appeared from the return of the sheriff upon the summons in said cause that it had been duly served upon Mrs. S. H. Spencer, the mother of the defendants. The defendants, however, contended that, notwithstanding the return of the sheriff, said summons had not in fact been served upon her.
On the trial of this cause the sheriff testified, in corroboration of his return to the writ, that he did in fact duly serve the summons on Mrs. Spencer. Her children, who were defendants, were allowed to testify…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mason and Another v. . MilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- Banks v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Strayhorn v. . BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Chadbourn v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Banks v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Guthrie v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Harrington v. RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Dunn v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Az v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Long v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.