Legal Opinion

Banks v. Lane

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Claek, O. J.

This is a petition to rehear this case, 170 N. C., 14. Tbe action was brought by R. C. Banks and wife, tbe feme plaintiff being tbe mortgagee of a tract of land embraced in tbe “Mosely Creek Drainage District,” against George B. Lane, tbe sheriff of Craven County, and George B. Pate, tbe mortgagor and owner of said tract of land, who was in possession, and the Mosely Creek Drainage District.

Tbe feme plaintiff set out her chain of title down to August, 1913, when she conveyed to George B. Pate and took from him a mortgage back to secure tbe purchase money. Her complaint averred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newby & White v. Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Drainage Commissioners of Washington County District, No. 4 v. Eastern Home & Farm Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Banks v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Parker v. . BledsoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lake Drainage Commissioners v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Worthington v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Caviness v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Leary v. Board of Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. O'Neal v. . MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API