Legal Opinion
Aven v. Reeh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 19, 1994No. 82865PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
The issue here is the timeliness of Plaintiffs appeal. Defendants claim the appeal came to this Court too late. We conclude that it came too early, and dismiss the appeal for prematurity.
Plaintiff brought a tort action in the District Court. Defendants filed motions for summary judgment.1 On December 6, 1993 the trial court caused to be filed an instru*1070ment sustaining the motions with prejudice. This order was mailed to the parties on December 7,1993. The petition in error was filed on January 10, 1994. Defendants’ response to the petition in error argues that the appeal was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Woody v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Elliott v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McMillian v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Washington v. State ex rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- PAYNE v. KERNSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Corbit v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Brown v. Green Country Softball Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.