Legal Opinion

Morris v. Frudenfeld

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1982No. Civ. 62775PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COOPERMAN, J. *

Plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict in her favor in a medical malpractice action, awarding her $1,708 in damages.

The complaint in this case was filed on January 21, 1977. The basic allegations thereof charged negligence against defendant Frudenfeld and others in the performance of bilateral tubal ligation upon plaintiff on or about June 27, 1974, for the purpose of sterilization. The complaint further alleges plaintiff became pregnant in early 1976.

The case proceeded to trial on or about July 28, 1980, in the Southwest District of the Superior Court of Los Angeles…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Turpin v. SortiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Stills v. GrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gerard v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Bank of America v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Burns v. HansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Girdley v. CoatsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Hensley v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API