Legal Opinion

Gerard v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1988No. B003449PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOERTZEN, J.

This appeal has been preceded by a trial for libel, consolidating two complaints; a trial for malicious prosecution; an appeal, resulting in an August 21, 1978, opinion by Ashby, J., Hastings, J., and Kaus, J.; and a second trial for malicious prosecution. All parties appeal from the judgment.

Underlying Facts

George Gerard (Gerard) has been a resident of Inglewood since 1962. In 1968, he became interested in local politics; his involvement increased in July 1969, when Inglewood formed a redevelopment agency and his friend, the planning director, was fired. At that time he…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
  2. Casey v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Fraidin v. WeitzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API