Legal Opinion

State v. Melchior

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1978No. 77-1125PublishedCited by 193 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I

Sweenet, J.

In his first proposition of law, appellant *20contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it instructed the jury that the appellant must prove the affirmative defense of self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence.

The Court of Appeals, although finding that the trial court had improperly placed upon the defendant a higher degree of proof than necessary to successfully raise the issue of self-defense, held that there was no prejudicial error, since there was insufficient evidence to even raise the defense. We agree.

R. C. 2901.05(A) provides:

“Every person accused…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by193 opinions

  1. State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. RobbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1986

188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API