State v. Melchior
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
I
Sweenet, J.
In his first proposition of law, appellant *20contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it instructed the jury that the appellant must prove the affirmative defense of self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
The Court of Appeals, although finding that the trial court had improperly placed upon the defendant a higher degree of proof than necessary to successfully raise the issue of self-defense, held that there was no prejudicial error, since there was insufficient evidence to even raise the defense. We agree.
R. C. 2901.05(A) provides:
“Every person accused…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RobbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.