Legal Opinion

State v. Palmer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1997No. 1996-2301PublishedCited by 213 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Appellant presents twenty-five propositions of law for our consideration. (See Appendix, infra.) We have carefully considered each of appellant’s propositions of law and have reviewed the death sentence for appropriateness and proportionality. Upon review, and for the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the sentence of death.

I

We have held, time and again, that this court is not required to address and discuss, in opinion form, each and every proposition of law raised by the parties in a death penalty appeal. We adhere to that position today. Many of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by213 opinions

  1. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. BasemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API