Legal Opinion

Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 14, 1950No. C. D. 1273PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

Plaintiff, whose business includes the manufacture of pharmaceuticals, imported from Switzerland, a digitalis glucoside, known as cedilanid substance. The merchandise, plaintiff’s exhibit 1, consists of a hermetically sealed glass container with a capacity of approximately 340 cubic centimeters, holding 100 grams of the cedilanid substance, being a white powder possessing therapeutic properties.

The collector classified the shipment as a digitalis glucoside in ampoules under the provisions of paragraphs 5 and 23, as amended by the trade agreement with Switzerland, 69 Treas. Dec.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Walker Services v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. Smith & Son Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Keer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API