Smith & Son Manufacturing Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The duty paragraph 23 of the Tariff Act of 1922 is as follows:
Chemicals, drugs, medicinal and similar substances, whether dutiable or free, when imported in capsules, pills, tablets, lozenges, troches, ampoules, jubes, or similar forms, including powders put up in medicinal doses, shall be dutiable at not less than 25 per centum ad valorem.
Paragraph 1510, in connection with section 201 of the same act, gives free entry to—
Antitoxins, vaccines, viruses, serums, and bacteri'ns used for therapeutic purposes.
The merchandise involved in this case is vaccine imported in ampoules and used by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McKesson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Dodge & Olcott v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
- Britt v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Roerig v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- United States v. Alltransport, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Alltransport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Scharf Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.