Legal Opinion

First National Life Assurance Society of America v. Farquhar

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1913No. 11222PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered July 19, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on promissory notes.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The complaint in this case contains two causes of action, separately stated. Each action is based upon a promissory note. In the first cause of action, aside from formal parts, it is alleged, that on the 23d day of October, 1909, the defendant, Frank S. Farquhar, made, executed, and delivered to T. D. Collis, as agent for the plaintiff, a promissory note in the sum of $368.90, the note being set out in extenso; that, at the time the note was executed and delivered, T. D. Collis, named as payee therein, was the agent of the plaintiff; that the real payee was the First National Life Assurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Stinson v. SachsWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Norton v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
  2. United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
  3. Tassel v. McGrailWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Anderson v. Julia K.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Whitman Realty & Investment Co. v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API