Legal Opinion
Saarstahl AG v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 2, 1996No. Consolidated Court No. 93-04-00219PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1414Opinion
Carman, Chief Judge:
Before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend its Complaint to include a Count VII challenging the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) use of the 15-year useful life found in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax tables to allocate the benefit of nonrecurring subsidies, rather than the actual average useful life of Saarstahl’s physical assets. Saarstahl requests the Court remand the issue to the International Trade Administration (ITA) with instructions to allocate the benefit of nonrecurring subsidies based upon the actual average…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- The Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana v. Harry L. Laws Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Consolidated Bearings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Saarstahl Ag v. United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Inland Steel Bar Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Saarstahl Ag v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.