Legal Opinion
State v. Dixon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 11, 1991No. 9138PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered after he had entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere, pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a, to charges of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b), and conspiracy to sell narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 21a-277 (a). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motions to suppress and his motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. DudleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. AcostaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. GregoryConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. MitchellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.