Legal Opinion
State v. Mitchell
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 10, 2008No. AC 27074PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Philip Mitchell, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly denied his motions to suppress a statement he made to the police prior to being told of his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966), and the victim’s identification of the defendant, and (2) abused its discretion in refusing to sanction the state for failing to produce an officer’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. JacksonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008