Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 7, 1992No. 10094PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The state of Connecticut appeals, with the permission of the trial court, from the court’s judgment granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evi*308dence and its judgment dismissing the charge of illegal possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b). The state claims that the trial court incorrectly ruled that the affidavit in support of a search warrant authorizing searches of the defendant’s house, his business and his person failed to establish probable cause. The state also argues that, viewed together, the four tips supplied by three…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. State v. TothConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. State v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. State v. VincentConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. State v. MarsalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API