Legal Opinion
State v. Acosta
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 2, 2010No. AC 29954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendant, Noel Acosta, Jr., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress a statement he made to the police, (2) the court improperly denied his Batson* 2 challenge during jury selection and (3) the jury’s verdict finding him guilty of robbery is inconsistent with the jury’s verdict finding him not guilty of charges of burglary in the first degree in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. HodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. CanalesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SilverConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Gamble v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. AcostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. AcostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010