Legal Opinion
Pacific Indem. Co. v. Ornellas
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1969No. Civ. 25590PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChristian, J.
Appellants Joseph and Genevieve Ornellas appeal from a judgment declaring that they had no cause of action against respondent insurance company under the uninsured motorists provisions of the Insurance Code (Ins. Code, § 11580.2). The trial court based its decision upon the failure of appellants to comply with section 11580.2, subdivision (h), which provides: “No cause of action shall accrue to the insured under any policy or endorsement provision issued pursuant to this section unless within one year from the date of the accident: (1) Suit for bodily injury has been filed against the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Firemen's Insurance v. DiskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Brandenburger v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Spear v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Branham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- United States v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- CALIFORNIA STATE AUTO. ASSN. INTER-INS. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.